Nye and Armitage misunderstand the "comfort women"

By -
The Asahi Shimbun quotes Joseph Nye's comment that seems to support them.
Joseph Nye, a former U.S. assistant secretary of defense, warned that any move by Tokyo to revise the 1993 Kono statement of apology to former “comfort women” will only undermine Japan’s national interests.

The Harvard University professor, who is well-versed in issues related to Japan, told a symposium in Tokyo on Oct. 30 that the government’s questioning of details of the statement would give countries such as China and South Korea an opportunity to condemn Japan.
Who is "moving" to revise the Kono Statement? Nobody in the Abe administration moves. Cabinet Chief Suga said it was incorrect that Kono had commented "there was military coercion" (kyosei renkou) in the press conference. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs demanded the United Nations to delete the quotation of Yoshida in the Coomaraswamy Report.

Nobuyuki Sugiura, the managing editor of the Asahi acknowledged that there was no military coercion in the press conference on September 11. Since everybody agrees that there was no military coercion, there is no need to revise the Kono Statement. Only the Asahi should unequivocally retract all the articles about military coercion and apologize to the world.
Former U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, who also attended the symposium, echoed Nye’s sentiments. Armitage compared the comfort women issue with the history of hardships facing blacks in the United States, saying America will continue to apologize for their unfair treatment.
Armitage mistakes comfort women for black slaves. It was the worst kind of slavery that "coerced" 15 millions of blacks from Africa. The United States Consitution protected the ownership of slaves. They should apologize it forever. In contrast, prostitutes in Japan were sold by their parents for some years of training. After the training, they were free to exit the brothels. Japanese government never protected the ownership of human beings.

Comfort women were not "sex slaves" but common prostitutes recruited by private agents. Although they became prostitutes against their will, the reason was not military enforcement but poverty.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A troubling position on 'comfort women'

By -
The Yomiuri Shimbun's editorial criticizes the EU Parliament's resolution: The Japanese government must lobby other governments to persuade them not to follow in the footsteps of the European Parliament in adopting a resolution that sullies Japan's standing. The European Parliament has adopted a resolution condemning Japan over the "comfort women" issue. The resolution calls for the government to apologize, saying the Imperial armed forces coerced young women in Asia to work as "sex slaves" before and during World War II. The latest development resembles the resolution adopted by the U.S. House of Representatives over the comfort women issue in July. This matter has now spilled over to Europe. The parliaments of Canada and the Netherlands also have adopted similar resolutions. However, interest in the comfort women issue has not necessarily been high in Europe. The European Parliament's resolution was advocated by the minor Green Party and fewer tha
Read more

Asahi Shimbun fabricated "comfort women"

By -
Image
All these things began with a wrong article. "Comfort women" or  "military abduction" weren't discussed before it. The Asahi Shimbun reported in the front page on 11 January 1992 that the historian Yoshiaki Yoshimi discovered documents that proves the Army's "commitment" to comfort women in the archives of Japan's Defense Agency.
Read more

Greenpeace Is a Thief

By -
Greenpeace Japan filed a criminal complaint with Japanese prosecutors Thursday, accusing whaling-ship crew members of stealing whale meat from a hunting trip. However, the alleged "evidence" was stolen from the warehouse . Jun Hoshikawa, the director of Greenpeace Japan, admitted that they stole it and apologized. According to the Japanese law, the object which was collected with illegal measure can't be an evidence. So their accusation will be rejected. This is a typical hypocrisy of so-called radical ecologists. Western people want to save the whale, while they are killing millions of cows, pigs, and other animals everyday, more than any eastern people. As eating cows is the western tradition, so eating whale is Japanese tradition. Nobody can tell which tradition is correct or incorrect. Greenpeace is the worst model of western ethnocentrism . Even more foolish is the Japanese like Hoshikawa, who imports the western arrogance to Japan. Fortunately no Japanese media is s
Read more